Time for a new blog don't you think?
Many topics, many topics.
The Seattle Port Authority not allowing Christmas trees so as not to offend anyone? "We're here to promote peace and harmony." Quote from the deputy managing director of the airport. There will be decorations this year, trees, fabrics and garlands, but nothing with religious ties. The displays will "reflect the Pacific Northwest environment and our diverse community." "We want our passengers to have a sense of celebration and comfort as they travel through our airport."
Just for those "green" rascals. The display will be made from recyclable cardboard tubes, biodegradable cotton material and acrylic ice.
Now I'm at peace and in harmony. Pissed off though.
Oops not so fast.
What about the North Carolina man who found an amputated leg in his smoker? (Wonder how Crawdaddy would feel if he found that in one of his grills?) He refused to return it as he wanted to build a museum and charge $10 for people to view the limb.
The leg belonged to a fellow who had it amputated after a 2004 airplane accident. He put it in the smoker which was kept in a rented storage space. The contents of that space were auctioned when the bill wasn't paid. No clue as to why he put it there to begin with.
Now I'm not sure which one of the fools is a bigger idiot. So much for peace and harmony.
Oh, by the way, this dispute was settled by a TV judge in favor of the amputee. Maybe a tad of peace and harmony.
What about this?
The man who had his girlfriend arrested for assault. She bit his bottom lip off while they were kissing. The lip was found on the floor but was, sadly, not able to be reattached. (John Boy and Billy's Lipless now has serious competition.) No clue as to how this has turned out. Not sure I really care.
No peace and harmony there.
And finally.
I've been on jury duty this week. Haven't been chosen yet which is not too surprising. But after observing the potential jurors and listening to their questions, I hope none of us has to be judged by these "peers".
While leaving the courthouse today, I stopped in the men's room. After standing in line for a few minutes, my turn arrived. OK no problem, but then in the occupied stall next to me, a cell phone rang and was answered. A conversation (seemed like a business call but couldn't be sure; makes no difference) ensued as if no one else was around and continued after I had flushed. Kinda made me want to flush many, many more times but there was a line behind me.
Now that's just not right! People please think about your surroundings before answering a damn cell phone!
You'd think one could find some semblence of peace and harmony in a restroom.
Guess I'm just going to have to meander up to the grassy knoll for peace and harmony!
Wednesday, November 7, 2007
Thursday, October 18, 2007
various ramblins
It's been awhile. Just not in the mood to get lathered up lately, not even about the guy who discovered a leg in the grill he'd purchased and refused to return it to the guy who put it in there. But just spend a few hours on our interstate system, and that'll do the trick.
Of course, I write about those who think the left lane is their private lane for driving. Did they ever notice or care about the signs that indicate that "slower traffic keep right"? Guess not, or then again maybe they don't think they are slow, dumb and stupid.
In years past, I drove to work at a time in the early morning when there was no traffic (and I mean no traffic). People would actually get onto the interstate at that time, automatically get in the left lane and drive the speed limit with no one else around. I guess it was to get into the proper lane for the exit 5-7 miles ahead (which in their defense was to the left).
I as always taught to get around the car I was passing as quickly as possible. Around being the key word here. That means, pass and get back into your original lane. If passing a number of cars (or just 1), don't drive to the point of significantly slowing those behind you in that lane. Get up to a decent speed (OK maybe not 100, but you know what I mean), get AROUND em and GET OVER. What's difficult about that?
There was a minivan in the left lane last week, doing about 70, maybe 75 downhill, maybe 60 uphill). Had a bunch of cars behind who were slowly advancing by passing on the right. Took a bunch of miles, and I got my chance. Went around, noticed that the driver was on a cell phone (more about that later), got really puckered, rolled down the window and showed a gesture of my dissatisfaction. I hope those following me gave the same gesture as no effort was made to get to the right lane, in spite of no one in that lane.
The best comment I ever heard is from Fierce Chipmunk Hunter who has stated that anybody who gets passed in the right lane should have their license revoked. Doesn't matter if you're doing 100 or not. Away it goes!
Now to this cell phone business. I have nothing against using the phone while you're driving but you damn well better be paying attention to what you're doing. And if you ain't, I hope you don't hurt anybody else when you roll the car, rear-end, side-swipe, or wipe-out somebody else. And that you get an ass-buster of a ticket. (And I'm not, at this time, going to discuss the inappropriateness of using a cell phone in a restroom. Maybe never as this is just wrong, wrong, wrong.)
And to the people who leave shopping carts in the parking lots. Are you just too damn lazy and inconsiderate to walk, at most, a few more yards to put the thing in an appropriate spot. I've even questioned some with that very statement. Sadly only to receive a blank stare or "I found it here" from the woman putting her infant in the car seat while leaving one of those car-like carts smack in the middle of the parking spot next to her. I actually got a "yes" from one.
Come on people, let's all get a bit more considerate and think of others while driving, yaking on a cell phone or abandoning a shopping cart.
This just in. A newspaper columnist expressing surprise, SURPRISE that his senator voted for some pork project. Seems that she was voting for boats that neither the Navy nor Coast Guard wanted. Did, however, go to a company whose executives had made campaign contributions. I think this columnist needs to come to grip with the real world.
Enough ramblins for the time being. Until later
Of course, I write about those who think the left lane is their private lane for driving. Did they ever notice or care about the signs that indicate that "slower traffic keep right"? Guess not, or then again maybe they don't think they are slow, dumb and stupid.
In years past, I drove to work at a time in the early morning when there was no traffic (and I mean no traffic). People would actually get onto the interstate at that time, automatically get in the left lane and drive the speed limit with no one else around. I guess it was to get into the proper lane for the exit 5-7 miles ahead (which in their defense was to the left).
I as always taught to get around the car I was passing as quickly as possible. Around being the key word here. That means, pass and get back into your original lane. If passing a number of cars (or just 1), don't drive to the point of significantly slowing those behind you in that lane. Get up to a decent speed (OK maybe not 100, but you know what I mean), get AROUND em and GET OVER. What's difficult about that?
There was a minivan in the left lane last week, doing about 70, maybe 75 downhill, maybe 60 uphill). Had a bunch of cars behind who were slowly advancing by passing on the right. Took a bunch of miles, and I got my chance. Went around, noticed that the driver was on a cell phone (more about that later), got really puckered, rolled down the window and showed a gesture of my dissatisfaction. I hope those following me gave the same gesture as no effort was made to get to the right lane, in spite of no one in that lane.
The best comment I ever heard is from Fierce Chipmunk Hunter who has stated that anybody who gets passed in the right lane should have their license revoked. Doesn't matter if you're doing 100 or not. Away it goes!
Now to this cell phone business. I have nothing against using the phone while you're driving but you damn well better be paying attention to what you're doing. And if you ain't, I hope you don't hurt anybody else when you roll the car, rear-end, side-swipe, or wipe-out somebody else. And that you get an ass-buster of a ticket. (And I'm not, at this time, going to discuss the inappropriateness of using a cell phone in a restroom. Maybe never as this is just wrong, wrong, wrong.)
And to the people who leave shopping carts in the parking lots. Are you just too damn lazy and inconsiderate to walk, at most, a few more yards to put the thing in an appropriate spot. I've even questioned some with that very statement. Sadly only to receive a blank stare or "I found it here" from the woman putting her infant in the car seat while leaving one of those car-like carts smack in the middle of the parking spot next to her. I actually got a "yes" from one.
Come on people, let's all get a bit more considerate and think of others while driving, yaking on a cell phone or abandoning a shopping cart.
This just in. A newspaper columnist expressing surprise, SURPRISE that his senator voted for some pork project. Seems that she was voting for boats that neither the Navy nor Coast Guard wanted. Did, however, go to a company whose executives had made campaign contributions. I think this columnist needs to come to grip with the real world.
Enough ramblins for the time being. Until later
Tuesday, September 25, 2007
we elect these people for this????????????
In the "you're kidding, right?" category. By the way this was on the FRONT page of the newspaper.
The city council voted to allow miniature goats to be kept as pets. Due to the tireless efforts of the "Goat Justice League (who can make this up?), their attributes as human companion, milk maker and "weed whacker" justified the unanimous vote. The councilman who sponsored this vital legislation was quoted " one small step for man, one giant leap for goatkind."
Here's the deal: A local resident and "outlaw" goat owner, president of the Goat Justice League (still cannot get over this), a distinguished group of 100 members sought this change in the old law after her neighbor alerted the city and complained. During a hearing, testimony was presented by "animal lovers, advocates of urban sustainability and children". (you know I can see animal lovers, but children???? And I'm not even going to go there on those advocates. Advocates of WHAT exactly?)
Well after, I'm sure, much debate, thought and deliberation, this was approved as long as the goats are licensed and dehorned. (Who wants a horny, old goat running around? Couldn't pass that one up!) IN ADDITION, male goats have to be neutered (good idea for the continuation of the species) as they give off a rather musky scent which some find offensive (hurray for the anti-musky goat smellin league). They also have to be kept on a leash to protect park vegetation and sidewalk gardens, but they can be lent to others for grazing purposes.
It's good to know that our elected officials are SO busy with these weighty matters. Holding hearings and what-not. Don't want to waste valuable time and effort with more mundane topics as EDUCATION, INFRASTRUCTURE and such.
But not to be outdone, another councilman wanted to grab the spotlight as he proclaimed "Why stop there? Why not sheep, llamas...? I think there is an argument that there are greater heights to be achieved with urban sustainability."
Now these guys are showing serious political potential! They should definitely try for a more national position! But then again, why replace the fine ones' we have now?
Have a nice day!
The city council voted to allow miniature goats to be kept as pets. Due to the tireless efforts of the "Goat Justice League (who can make this up?), their attributes as human companion, milk maker and "weed whacker" justified the unanimous vote. The councilman who sponsored this vital legislation was quoted " one small step for man, one giant leap for goatkind."
Here's the deal: A local resident and "outlaw" goat owner, president of the Goat Justice League (still cannot get over this), a distinguished group of 100 members sought this change in the old law after her neighbor alerted the city and complained. During a hearing, testimony was presented by "animal lovers, advocates of urban sustainability and children". (you know I can see animal lovers, but children???? And I'm not even going to go there on those advocates. Advocates of WHAT exactly?)
Well after, I'm sure, much debate, thought and deliberation, this was approved as long as the goats are licensed and dehorned. (Who wants a horny, old goat running around? Couldn't pass that one up!) IN ADDITION, male goats have to be neutered (good idea for the continuation of the species) as they give off a rather musky scent which some find offensive (hurray for the anti-musky goat smellin league). They also have to be kept on a leash to protect park vegetation and sidewalk gardens, but they can be lent to others for grazing purposes.
It's good to know that our elected officials are SO busy with these weighty matters. Holding hearings and what-not. Don't want to waste valuable time and effort with more mundane topics as EDUCATION, INFRASTRUCTURE and such.
But not to be outdone, another councilman wanted to grab the spotlight as he proclaimed "Why stop there? Why not sheep, llamas...? I think there is an argument that there are greater heights to be achieved with urban sustainability."
Now these guys are showing serious political potential! They should definitely try for a more national position! But then again, why replace the fine ones' we have now?
Have a nice day!
Friday, September 21, 2007
idiocy rum amok
What about this? 3 in 3 days. Must be something in the wind. Normally I don't get too pissed off on a Friday as generally think it's poor form but this caught my eye (and ire).
There was an article in the Washington Post regarding TSA (you know those folks at airport security check-ins) taking a closer look at travelers' mannerisms. It seems that they have been using a sneaky, dastardly approach to screening. That is studying facial expressions and behavior. Oh the horror!
The TSA intends to have about 1,000 screeners (why not all of em?) trained in this technique by year's end. This involves the art of observing slight facial movements (among others) to indicate that a person is lying. Maybe a good way to spot some criminal behavior?
Since Jan 06 (that's about 21 months for those somewhat challenged), they have referred 40,000 for extra screening. Of that amount nearly 300 have been arrested for such crimes as carrying concealed weapons, drug trafficking and illegal immigration. (Don't say how many potential terrorists, don't care.)
Well wouldn't you just know that this practice has gotten the civil libertarians and some politicians all in a lather. Privacy rights, racial and ethnic profiling are at stake here. Now hearings in Congress are going to be held. (Doesn't that make you sleep better at night?)
A comment to those blithering idiots all worked up: GET A GRIP! (That's a bit on the subdued side as my Mother may read this, and I don't want her to think her baby boy is capable of such language.)
I got it. Maybe the TSA should pass out a questionnaire asking if you are a lying, no-good terrorist (gun-totin crook, crack head or any other moron); and if so, please check the appropriate box. Don't pay any attention that I'm sweating through my clothes, have a nervous tick and after staring at any security personnel, quickly look away after noticed. Hey, I'm just going to visit my dear, old, sick great-grandmother (aunt, uncle, dog, hamster, whatever).
Just as long as you don't offend anybody! What difference does it make if the plane goes down anyway? Just a few people killed, no big deal. But heaven, forbid offend anybody!
As an aside, testing is going on to see through clothing with Superman-like vision. Ain't that something. I pity the poor rascal who looks at my image.
And with that, have a good weekend! Maybe enjoy a brown liquor drink!
There was an article in the Washington Post regarding TSA (you know those folks at airport security check-ins) taking a closer look at travelers' mannerisms. It seems that they have been using a sneaky, dastardly approach to screening. That is studying facial expressions and behavior. Oh the horror!
The TSA intends to have about 1,000 screeners (why not all of em?) trained in this technique by year's end. This involves the art of observing slight facial movements (among others) to indicate that a person is lying. Maybe a good way to spot some criminal behavior?
Since Jan 06 (that's about 21 months for those somewhat challenged), they have referred 40,000 for extra screening. Of that amount nearly 300 have been arrested for such crimes as carrying concealed weapons, drug trafficking and illegal immigration. (Don't say how many potential terrorists, don't care.)
Well wouldn't you just know that this practice has gotten the civil libertarians and some politicians all in a lather. Privacy rights, racial and ethnic profiling are at stake here. Now hearings in Congress are going to be held. (Doesn't that make you sleep better at night?)
A comment to those blithering idiots all worked up: GET A GRIP! (That's a bit on the subdued side as my Mother may read this, and I don't want her to think her baby boy is capable of such language.)
I got it. Maybe the TSA should pass out a questionnaire asking if you are a lying, no-good terrorist (gun-totin crook, crack head or any other moron); and if so, please check the appropriate box. Don't pay any attention that I'm sweating through my clothes, have a nervous tick and after staring at any security personnel, quickly look away after noticed. Hey, I'm just going to visit my dear, old, sick great-grandmother (aunt, uncle, dog, hamster, whatever).
Just as long as you don't offend anybody! What difference does it make if the plane goes down anyway? Just a few people killed, no big deal. But heaven, forbid offend anybody!
As an aside, testing is going on to see through clothing with Superman-like vision. Ain't that something. I pity the poor rascal who looks at my image.
And with that, have a good weekend! Maybe enjoy a brown liquor drink!
Thursday, September 20, 2007
various ramblins
A friend called earlier and wanted to know what I thought about the Iranian president laying a wreath at Ground Zero. Told her that I thought it was fine as long as the wreath was made out of explosive materials. Or that the vehicle in which he was riding hit a road-side bomb manufactured in Iran.
Actually, I was not aware that he was attending a meeting at the UN. Now that's an august body that should be dropped into the sea. Anybody read anything positive that the UN has accomplished lately? Or for that matter, ever?
On another unrelated matter. I haven't really read much about the "Jena 6" so I'm not qualified to render an opinion. However, any occasion that has drawn Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and their like should immediately be dismissed and ignored. I'm convinced that they have done more harm for race relations in the past 25-30 years than anybody. Even more than the NAACP.
Don't you just hope that OJ gets life? And that's enough on that subject.
And with that, good day!
Actually, I was not aware that he was attending a meeting at the UN. Now that's an august body that should be dropped into the sea. Anybody read anything positive that the UN has accomplished lately? Or for that matter, ever?
On another unrelated matter. I haven't really read much about the "Jena 6" so I'm not qualified to render an opinion. However, any occasion that has drawn Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and their like should immediately be dismissed and ignored. I'm convinced that they have done more harm for race relations in the past 25-30 years than anybody. Even more than the NAACP.
Don't you just hope that OJ gets life? And that's enough on that subject.
And with that, good day!
Wednesday, September 19, 2007
not all that pissed off
Been away for a bit. Doing some really enjoyable stuff and don't have a tremendous axe to grind on the pissed off scale. (Am sure that will change in the days ahead though)
Even the air travel wasn't enough to get me started (that'll damn sure change).
Having kids and grandchildren around was absolutely fabulous. And the older they get keeps the festiveness going. Disappointed that it wasn't longer but will take what I can get.
It's truly wonderful watching the little ones' faces as they observe the goings on around them. Even the smallest, most simplistic item can produce such an intense focus. And the excitement they show cannot help but put a huge smile on your face.
And the enjoyment watching the kids' interaction and fascination with their children is outstanding. They are to be complimented with the job they're doing.
To add to the syrupiness, we are blessed that the kids have married the most delightful, fun, supportive, thankful, and a bunch of other accolades, spouses. Thank you (and your parents) for who you are.
Didn't think I was going to go all out and not have the least bit of pissed off ramblins, huh?
Enough of the whining: UT fans who think Florida ran up the score. (didn't play too good, huh?) Donovan McNabb on the additional scrutiny that black qb's receive (didn't you just get beat by a team with a black qb?) And last, but not least, -Americans. (if you were born in the US, you are an AMERICAN)
Enough for today, more at a later date.
Even the air travel wasn't enough to get me started (that'll damn sure change).
Having kids and grandchildren around was absolutely fabulous. And the older they get keeps the festiveness going. Disappointed that it wasn't longer but will take what I can get.
It's truly wonderful watching the little ones' faces as they observe the goings on around them. Even the smallest, most simplistic item can produce such an intense focus. And the excitement they show cannot help but put a huge smile on your face.
And the enjoyment watching the kids' interaction and fascination with their children is outstanding. They are to be complimented with the job they're doing.
To add to the syrupiness, we are blessed that the kids have married the most delightful, fun, supportive, thankful, and a bunch of other accolades, spouses. Thank you (and your parents) for who you are.
Didn't think I was going to go all out and not have the least bit of pissed off ramblins, huh?
Enough of the whining: UT fans who think Florida ran up the score. (didn't play too good, huh?) Donovan McNabb on the additional scrutiny that black qb's receive (didn't you just get beat by a team with a black qb?) And last, but not least, -Americans. (if you were born in the US, you are an AMERICAN)
Enough for today, more at a later date.
Wednesday, August 29, 2007
out of control
There are a few topics that can fall under this category. The beauty queen contestant in South Carolina who horribly flubbed the question about why 20% of Americans can't locate the US on a map. The Idaho Senator's arrest of lewd behavior. The "diaper-free" movement (no pun intended). The obesity rates increasing in 31 states.
This ramblin originates from Seattle, WA. Last week, the local newspaper evidently ran a photo of 2 men on a ferry (the picture was taken by the captain.) who were acting suspiciously. The FBI was requesting assistance in identifying and locating them for questioning. The article made no reference as to the nationality, race or religious preference. The photo was clear, however, that the men were of middle-eastern descent.
To most of the security conscious and concerned citizenry, this was a most logical and efficient means of law enforcement's requesting aid. The captain of the vessel was concerned enough to take a photo, for pity's sake. By the way, no mention of the captain's nationality, race or religious preference was made.
This dastardly deed sure seemed to pucker up the Arab and Muslim-American leaders in this community. (Well boo, the damn, who!) (Nothing like a little racial profiling accusation to get the juices flowing.) They want the FBI to apologize for not consulting them before running the photo. Oh the insensitivity.
First of all, I'd be interested in knowing how those leaders knew the 2 men were Muslim? They could have been converted Catholics or even Jews. How can one tell by a photo? That's some unbelieveable anaylsis.
Secondly, when is the last time we heard of any of those leaders, either local, national or global, condemn any of the actions of the terrorists (who last time I checked were of middle east backgrounds)? Maybe when they get a bit more vocal, then I'll get more concerned by their pucker factors. Then again, if the terrorist activities continue by Arabs, I'll remain totally unmoved (and even more pissed off).
Besides, I thought we were only looking to question them not send them to Gitmo which might not be a bad idea either.
For what it's worth, the letters to the editor in the Sunday paper were overwhelmingly condemning those leaders. Finally some rational thought in that part of the country.
This ramblin originates from Seattle, WA. Last week, the local newspaper evidently ran a photo of 2 men on a ferry (the picture was taken by the captain.) who were acting suspiciously. The FBI was requesting assistance in identifying and locating them for questioning. The article made no reference as to the nationality, race or religious preference. The photo was clear, however, that the men were of middle-eastern descent.
To most of the security conscious and concerned citizenry, this was a most logical and efficient means of law enforcement's requesting aid. The captain of the vessel was concerned enough to take a photo, for pity's sake. By the way, no mention of the captain's nationality, race or religious preference was made.
This dastardly deed sure seemed to pucker up the Arab and Muslim-American leaders in this community. (Well boo, the damn, who!) (Nothing like a little racial profiling accusation to get the juices flowing.) They want the FBI to apologize for not consulting them before running the photo. Oh the insensitivity.
First of all, I'd be interested in knowing how those leaders knew the 2 men were Muslim? They could have been converted Catholics or even Jews. How can one tell by a photo? That's some unbelieveable anaylsis.
Secondly, when is the last time we heard of any of those leaders, either local, national or global, condemn any of the actions of the terrorists (who last time I checked were of middle east backgrounds)? Maybe when they get a bit more vocal, then I'll get more concerned by their pucker factors. Then again, if the terrorist activities continue by Arabs, I'll remain totally unmoved (and even more pissed off).
Besides, I thought we were only looking to question them not send them to Gitmo which might not be a bad idea either.
For what it's worth, the letters to the editor in the Sunday paper were overwhelmingly condemning those leaders. Finally some rational thought in that part of the country.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)